<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Most Dangerous Names on the Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleverbadger.net/2009/08/27/the-most-dangerous-names-on-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleverbadger.net/wordpress/2009/08/27/the-most-dangerous-names-on-the-internet/</link>
	<description>I&#039;m not dead yet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:14:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clever_Badger</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverbadger.net/wordpress/2009/08/27/the-most-dangerous-names-on-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Clever_Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverbadger.net/?p=587#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Heh. 
 
At the time I was in school, most people just used the computer labs.  Very few folks had their own PCs.   
 
I always tend to be somewhat skeptical of the numbers they report in things like this.  The key, I think, is the &quot;some form&quot; caveat, since &quot;malware&quot; can include anything from a tracking cookie to a trojan that actively looks for financial records, depending on what expert you ask. 
 
Lately I&#039;ve been getting a lot of pop-ups served from various websites for bogus security programs.  You&#039;ve probably seen them - full-page scare-ware screens with a lot of red text warning you that your computer is under attack and you REALLYNEEDTODOWNLOADOURSUPEREFFECTIVEPROTECTIONPROGRAM NOW!!!!  They&#039;ve become almost as common as Russian comment spam... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. </p>
<p>At the time I was in school, most people just used the computer labs.  Very few folks had their own PCs.   </p>
<p>I always tend to be somewhat skeptical of the numbers they report in things like this.  The key, I think, is the &quot;some form&quot; caveat, since &quot;malware&quot; can include anything from a tracking cookie to a trojan that actively looks for financial records, depending on what expert you ask. </p>
<p>Lately I&#039;ve been getting a lot of pop-ups served from various websites for bogus security programs.  You&#039;ve probably seen them &#8211; full-page scare-ware screens with a lot of red text warning you that your computer is under attack and you REALLYNEEDTODOWNLOADOURSUPEREFFECTIVEPROTECTIONPROGRAM NOW!!!!  They&#039;ve become almost as common as Russian comment spam&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Zelinsky</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverbadger.net/wordpress/2009/08/27/the-most-dangerous-names-on-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Zelinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverbadger.net/?p=587#comment-564</guid>
		<description>What? No part of the process involved going uphill both ways through snow? I&#039;m disappointed. 
 
I had a friend in college who had a separate, much cheaper computer for porn so that any viruses and spyware wouldn&#039;t wreck his computer. 
 
I think the thing that was newsworthy here wasn&#039;t that such things exist but that the percentage was surprisingly high.  20% having malware of some form is 3 or 4 times as high as I would have guessed and probably an order of magnitude higher than many people who are a) not pessimist and b) not very computer savvy would have guessed.  
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? No part of the process involved going uphill both ways through snow? I&#039;m disappointed. </p>
<p>I had a friend in college who had a separate, much cheaper computer for porn so that any viruses and spyware wouldn&#039;t wreck his computer. </p>
<p>I think the thing that was newsworthy here wasn&#039;t that such things exist but that the percentage was surprisingly high.  20% having malware of some form is 3 or 4 times as high as I would have guessed and probably an order of magnitude higher than many people who are a) not pessimist and b) not very computer savvy would have guessed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

